Tag Archive | jul

Christmas – once pagan always pagan?

Is it wrong to turn a pagan holiday into a christian celebration where we make a special commemoration of the birth of Jesus Christ? Would it really be better to view the day as an ordinary day, and skip all christmas carols, christmas food and meeting up with family and friends for the special occasion? You might say that it’s only the pagan parts of christmas that you’re against, but in that case the better option would be to avoid whatever christmas ingredients you dislike and celebrate christmas as per your own choice. Many people do just that, and the case is that most people celebrate christmas with Jesus Christ in mind and they truly believe he is the reason for the season. Also non-believers view christmas as a celebration for the birth of Jesus and that is what makes it so special. Every single year they are reminded of JESUS CHRIST. How else would a country where 90% are non-believers be exposed to Jesus Christ to the same extent? They certainly won’t come to church to find out.

There is a whole mixture of christmas traditions, and they differ world-wide, as well as within a country. Some celebrate it in a very secular way, and others with religious symbolism, and there really isn’t a “right way” (but there are many wrong ways) since the Bible doesn’t even mention Jesus’ birthday. The Bible doesn’t mention any other birthdays at all, perhaps with the exception of Herodes’ birthday, and he was a pretty mean guy who had a birthday party where he cut off the head of John the Baptist who was the forerunner to JESUS. Despite of this horrible event, we all imitate Herodes’ practice and celebrate our own birthdays. So the only Biblical mention of a birthday is tied to a very wicked ruler who maybe even invented “birthdays” and/or had a “birthday” party to bring fame to his own big name (I’m only speculating), and yet people today celebrate their own birthdays without giving it second thoughts. Also those who are against christmas celebrate their own birthdays.

Some families mix in traditions into christmas which are questionable, and maybe this is  a bigger problem than the fact that it started out as pagan? We don’t have to take the same route as they though. The fact that certain things are not mentioned in the Bible is of course not a reason in itself to avoid them, or else I could list quite a few traditions which people are involved with which are not mentioned or encouraged to be carried out by christians. Where in the Bible does it say that christians should eat birthday cakes? Or use special wedding rings, celebrate Thanksgiving (with turkey and other traditions), arrange special funeral events, mark oneself with tattoos, etc? Some of those who are against christmas are engaged in all of the above. Tattoos are very much rooted in paganism, and even if some feel they can show that there is no Biblical law against them, they are certainly not encouraged. I can’t find any support for that jews or christians used tattoos.

How it all started in Europe

When Europe started to get christianised, the Germanics used the same word for the celebration of the birth of Jesus, as for their own pagan celebration. Later on during 1000 AD in England and 1100 AD in Germany, “Cristes Mæsse” started to be used which became “Christmas” in English, whereas “wîhe nah” (the holy night) became “Weihnachten” in German. The Scandinavian countries kept the word Jul and never used any references to a “mass”. Noel entered English in the late 14th century and is from the Old French noel or nael, meaning “Christmas season”, itself ultimately from the Latinnatalis (dies), “birth (day)”.

The year 354 AD Liberius established the date for Christmas on December 25th (and a Holiday is considered to start at 18.00 the previous day which could explain why December 24th is celebrated in many countries). According to an old understanding of Genesis, the world was created during the vernal equinox and March 25th was considered as Mary’s Annunciation Day, so the birth of Jesus was calculated to 9 months thereafter – December 25th. The celebration of the birth of Jesus replaced, among other events, the Roman celebration of the sun-god Ra which was held during the winter solstice, but many other types of celebrations were held throughout Europe during the winter solstice. The transmission from the various types of celebrations that people were engaged in, to the new christian celebration, went smoothly since celebrations were already in practice during this time. The return of the light to earth after mid winter has symbolized the light of Jesus. The winter solstice occurs a few days before christmas nowadays due to changes in the calendar. It makes perfect sense for people who had not heard about Jesus to make a special event for the winter solstice.

The origin of “Santa Clause” is uncertain as well, and even though we can trace him back to 300 AD and St. Nicholas, each culture has added its own flavor to this man. In the US he is always depicted as a man with a red and white suit, but he can wear other colors in other countries, and he has various assignments. In the 1800’s in Sweden, he was often depicted as a little midget (much like the dwarves in Snow white) who helped the land owners to guard barns and stables and to help feed the animals. He did not come with any presents but HE liked to get a bowl of porridge once in a while, why some had as a tradition to place this dish outside the door for him. The content sometimes disappeared so it could be Jultomten (The Santa Clause) who ate it – or perhaps a fox? For us today it’s possible to celebrate Christmas without this man if he is too much of a problem.

How it all started in Scandinavia

In Sweden and in some other countries in Europe, it’s December 24th which is the big day, and particularly in the evening, but the entire “christmas season” is between December 24th to January 13th when the celebration is officially over. Many choose to get rid of their christmas tree on or around this final day (or a few days before if it’s shedding too many needles), and why the christmas tree is not referred to in Jeremiah 10 can be read here. The modern use of a tree inside the house for christmas is a tradition from Germany in the 1500´s, and candles started to be used in the trees in the 1600´s and 1700´s. Initially christmas trees, at least in Scandinavia, were used only among the more wealthy families.

It’s hard to know where “Jul” first started to be used as a word but the first occasion seems to be from Codes Ambrosianus A of the Gothic calendar, which was written about 500-600 AD. The fragment describes the end of October and the beginning of November, and the month of November is overwritten with “Naubaimbair: fruma Jiuleis” which could be translated as “November, the month before Yule”. At around 730 Ad Beda venerabilis wrote that the Anglosaxians’ calendar has the month “geola” or “giuli” which can correspond to December and/or December and January. December 25th seems to be the first day of the pagan new year which was celebrated. By the time Scandinavia was christianised around 1000 AD, christmas celebrations started to involve mixed elements between pagan, christian, Nordic and Germanic traditions from the time of the vikings and onwards. Most of the present traditions derive from  the 1800’s and 1900’s so they are modern and not tied to any pagan gods.

Saint Lucia – Celebrated December 13th in major parts of Scandinavia, with start in Sweden. The most commonly used explanation for the origin of this celebration is that it concerns a young Italian woman from Syracuse on Sicily (Italy) who around 300 AD was forced to marry a man who did not share her faith, and in order to not having to marry him she took her eyes out. Before the new Gregorian Calendar, the Lucia day occurred during the day of the winter solstice but this later changed. Again, it’s common to make extra festivities during a winter solstice. The origin of the Lucia celebrations in Sicily differs entirely from the one in Sweden. The Swedish Lucia tradition actually seems to be separated from the saint altogether, and the name Lucia was tied to the winter solstice  festivities during a later stage. It wasn’t until around the year 1900 when the Lucia tradition was established and commonly celebrated in Sweden. The way it has been celebrated has changed since the year 1900, but in schools today the Lucia and her maids sing Lucia songs and christian christmas songs (and a few others) and that in itself is spectacular. Because “forcing” a religion on someone is usually not acceptable in schools, so religious songs or teachings would normally not pass, BUT since the Lucia tradition is so old and so loved this tradition is an exception. Even if a parent in school would protest, all other parents would overrule the protest, and the tradition continues. This means students will continue to be affected by the glorious gospel about JESUS CHRIST who the Lucia sings about. The Lucia songs can be heard in public places all around the country and on TV, and it’s a great way to evangelize! Children often sing these christian songs to their grandparents or similar, when visiting them in their homes this special day. Lucia on youtube can be viewed here:

With this background in mind, is celebrating christmas wrong?

Maybe it’s harder for me to understand people’s disdain for christmas due to where I live – in a very secular country where people would raise their eyebrows and maybe even be shocked if you would ever say “God bless you” to them. Religion is usually understood as something very private and politicians would therefore never say “God bless you” or “Let’s pray…” during any public circumstances. In the US you might feel that it’s not a big deal to skip christmas altogether and delete it as a Holiday since you will always be surrounded by people, even at work, who do NOT feel you’re odd for being a born again christian.

I am just SO pleased we have christmas celebrations! During the rest of the year (maybe apart from Easter, Pentecost and Christ’s Ascension day) any promotion of christianity seems to be prohibited from the public arena. You wouldn’t hear any songs about Jesus Christ on the radio or TV, unless there is a certain documentary or similar, but during the christmas season suddenly everything is allowed! JESUS CHRIST is promoted big time, and churches don’t pay a dime for this promotion! If you’re in a store, a bus or in a waiting room, you might be hearing christmas music in the background, and the same applies if you zap around among the TV channels. Just imagine; without the need of christians coming together and pay big money for spreading the gospel of Jesus, THIS IS DONE FOR FREE! And it’s done by SECULAR people who are helping out promoting our Savior even if they are not aware of it! For several days in a row you will be listening to christmas songs which keep reminding also atheists of:

A savior is born! In Bethlehem, by a virgin which would be a sign for the Messiah! The baby in the manger is MIGHTY GOD says Isaiah! The LORD OF LORDS! Shepherds came to see him! They were guided from the East by a star, expecting a NEW BORN KING. Angels spoke to them and assured them a Savior is come to earth! Herod was afraid!  This baby would be born just to save people from their sins! People were expecting the Messiah and there he was! Oh Holy night! Peace on earth!

WHY would I vote for deleting christmas as a holiday, now when the gospel of Jesus Christ is spread to so many atheists?

Radio and TV

If religious songs would be played during any other time of the year, people would complain and point out that they shouldn’t have to be forced to listen to religious propaganda and that the radio hosts favor one religion over another, and they will likely be reported. But during the christmas time no one would even think about complaining despite that these songs are so frequent on all radio stations! It’s possible that you in the US have christian radio stations where you could listen to christian songs also the rest of the year, and there must be a few over here too, but if you’re not a christian of course you wouldn’t even look for one. When it comes to christmas, people WILL hear the christian songs whether they like it or not because ALL the radio stations play them – which are the radio stations these people usually listen to!

If we succeeded to persuade the politicians to abolish christmas altogether, it would mean that the radio stations and the TV channels would have no reason to play such christmas songs any more. Then those christians who voted down christmas, might contact the radio stations and offer to pay for “time slots” to play christians songs, but they would be turned down because the radio stations don’t play religious songs. Also TV-channels show many quality programs with christian christmas songs, and they are aired during the peak hours so loads of people can see them. They also make reruns of many programs. If you compare with other type of evangelization I can think of NO greater impact than broadcasting the Gospel right into people’s living rooms (for atheists) during the time when they will likely sit in front of the TV! These atheists might very well enjoy the music and sing along with the christian text. The Bible actually says that faith comes from hearing (the word of God) so this might be a start to peak their interest and a start on their salvation! And again, it doesn’t cost us christians anything! If we would try to make this on our own, it would cost us many millions to arrange a similar gospel campaign. Now, we don’t have to lift a finger, and still secular media will continue to spread the gospel by free will and no one is stopping them! The only ones who might interfere with this tradition and try to silence the christian christmas music might be those christians who oppose Christmas…

Changing dates?

The idea of changing dates for the Christmas holiday would of course not be achievable. I wouldn’t be able to make an impact on the leaders of this country to change Christmas from December 24th to September 24th even if many christians joined me in my efforts, and WHY would I even want to make an effort? It doesn’t matter when we celebrate christmas, but over here December 24th is perfect. It’s getting dark at 15.00 so we don’t have many hours of daylight, why a celebration which contain much Light comes in handy. IF christmas would be eliminated as a Holiday, it would likely result in LESS people who seek Jesus Christ and LESS people who get saved! If the politicians agreed to adhere to the christians’ call to eliminate christmas altogether since it’s pagan, and declared that the holiday would no longer be officially celebrated since it’s pagan and since it’s better to be neutral about religious holidays, then I’m rather sure atheists would take over this holiday and REALLY make it pagan. They might miss the Holiday of light and all the special events, so they might make their own traditions, and getting drunk might be one of the ingredients. Halloween started very recently in this country just from one year to another, so if Christmas was abolished something else will likely take its place.

Christian holidays will one day be abolished for the sake of neutrality

I believe that religious holidays will be abolished in the future anyway since the Antichrist is on his way and he won’t accept any public holidays where Jesus Christ is focused on, but why would we christians try to reach to this point sooner than we need? Jesus is coming soon and we need to spread the gospel! Not silence it! I read that in China also secular chinese people have started to pay attention to the christmas celebration. Particularly the youth and people who live on the coasts. When a lot of people celebrate christmas and tell the world WHY, also others might be affected and seek the Lord.

Even in schools they feel led to explain to their children WHY we celebrate christmas, and some even make a tradition to walk to a nearby church to see a nativity scene. Lately this has been questioned since the school education is supposed to be neutral, and it might start with one single parent who questions this tradition, with the result that school principal feels prone to agree and cancels a tradition which has been going on for many years. In reality there is room within the school laws to teach children about religions by making this type of excursions. Since this country has a christian history, why is it wrong to tell children about the reason for celebrating christmas? Where I live they solved the controversy (to single out christianity among other religions) by placing the nativity scene in the library instead of in the church (even though the church is just beside the library), and they explained the story of Joseph and Mary both from a christian point of view AND from the Islamic point of view! All for the sake of “neutrality”.

You decide over your own traditions

I just feel, that if we dislike certain christmas traditions, like the focus on Santa, too many and too expensive gifts, mistletoe arrangements, etc, then we should just avoid them and keep other traditions and/or start new ones which are more appropriate. Why the desire to eliminate the entire holiday and make it plain just because there are people who focus on the wrong things during this season? If you celebrate your own birthday without letting the wicked man Herodes bother you who is the only Biblical person who is mentioned celebrating a birthday, why is it wrong to select a day to celebrate the birth of Jesus, and why is it wrong to choose a former pagan day for this event? By choosing a former pagan day, you would kill two birds with one stone since you would disarm Satan with his pagan traditions, at the same time as you replaced the wicked traditions with a focus on JESUS CHRIST. Now we don’t have two competing holidays. Plus it’s a bit late to change dates now anyway. This is not about trying to turn the “pagan ship” around because it has already been turned around by people before us. We don’t celebrate December 25th to commemorate the sun-god any more, and even atheists can testify that the idea is to commemorate the birth of Jesus Christ. Seems like the angels,  shepherds and wise men found it natural to  react quite visibly on the birth of  Jesus Christ, and would they really be sinning if they commemorated the birth every year?

Barnen i Bollebygd som inte längre får samlas vid julkrubban vs Teater De Vill

Information om varför svenskarna firar jul

Ekdalens förskola i Bollebygds kommun kommer inte längre att ha en samling vid julkrubban hos Svenska Kyrkan, som tidigare gjorts i form av studiebesök enligt tidningen Dagen. Det är tråkigt när en trevlig och harmlös jultradition måste avbrytas pga en förälder som misstycker, och en skolledning som förmodligen i all välmening övertolkar skollagens regler.

Men Claes-Göran Aggebo, undervisningsråd på Skolverket säger:

Självklart finns det inget som hindrar ett besök om det ligger inom ramen för undervisningen. Läraren kan också bjuda in en utomstående aktör, som en präst i det här fallet, som får berätta, under förutsättning att den enskilda eleven inte tvingas delta i religiösa handlingar”

Det skulle alltså finnas utrymme för att göra sådana studiebesök, så den här traditionen hade inte behövt avbrytas. Vi bor väl i Sverige, och har inte Sverige en kristen historia? Varför är det då så känsligt att berätta om varför svenskarna firat jul i tvåhundra år, och varför borde vi känna trycket att undervisa om vilket ställningstagande andra kulturer och länder har i samma veva? Det är bra att undervisa om olika religioner på religionstimmarna, men det är hellet inget fel att särbehandla kristendomen som handlar om det här landets historia. Det här “lika för alla-tänket” är lite överdrivet i Sverige. Eftersom det handlar om förskolebarn har de ännu inte lärt sig att man kan studera uppkomsten och innebörden av julen på internet, varför ett besök i en kyrka i verkliga livet kan tyckas vara en bra idé i advent.  OM de hade kunnat läsa på nätet skulle de kunna läst på wikipedia:

Jul är en högtid med mycket gamla anor som firas i slutet av december. Julen har genom historien firats av olika orsaker och därtill förknippats med olika seder. I en västerländskkristenkontext firas julen till minne av Jesu födelse. Julhögtiden är en blandning av religiösa ochsekulära traditioner och skiljer sig mycket runt om i världen, och många firar idag jul med färre, eller inga religiösa inslag. Den officiella svenska julhögtiden börjar den 24 december (julaftonen, aftonen före juldagen) och avslutas den 13 januari (Tjugondag Knut) då “julen dansas ut”, även om det på senare tid blivit allt fler som inleder firandet tidigare[källa behövs] och betraktar det som avslutat i och med den sista lediga dagen 6 januari (trettondagen).

Ulf Gunnarsson, en förskolechef på skolan säger:  “Med sjätte paragrafen, första kapitlet i skollagen i ryggen har vi satt stopp för studiebesöket”.  Ja det är inte EMOT skollagen att INTE gå till en julkrubba i kyrkan, men lagen skulle lika gärna ha tolkats på ett annat sätt.

Teaterstycket “En lektion i kärlek” som spelas på “Teatern De vill”

Jag kan gärna jämföra Bollebygdsbarnens studiebesök med ovan nämnda teaterpjäs som tvingas/tvingades på många högstadieelever – åtminstone under 2010. Det var i vissa skolor obligatoriskt att vara åskådare till den här pjäsen om man valde Drama som ett tillval i skolan (och i andra skolor kanske hela klasser gick) men frågan är vad som skulle hända om föräldrar vägrade att låta sin fjortonåring delta i evenemanget? Sänkt eller ofullständigt betyg samt mobbing av kompisar? Det knepiga vad gäller teaterstycken är att man som förälder inte har en aning om innehållet eller vidden av den påverkan som regissörer och kulturskådespelare har på våra barn. Jag läste själv om just det här teaterstycket att den kan få föräldrar – sextiotalister – att RODNA och det tyckte jag lät oroväckande i sig. Teatern säger själva om sin föreställning:

Fjärilar i magen. Ögon som glittrar. Hjärtan som brinner. Flämtande lågor och djupa frågor. Ofokuserade tankar. Våta fantasier. Blossande röd. Drabbad och spröd. Klumpar i halsen. Skärande smärta. Pirrande farligt. Blödande sår och bultande underbart.—3 skådespelare gestaltar, under en dryg timme, ett tjugotal karaktärer i olika kostymer. Vi möter de förälskade, de otrogna, de lyckliga, de funktionsnedsatta, de kåta, de arga, de svikna, föräldrarna som försöker ge råd, de som vill komma ut och många fler. Med högt tempo, snabba klipp och fysiska uttryck leks det med kärlek

Tidningen Kulturen:

Handlingen kretsar kring ungdomars möte med erotiska känslor i olika former och omvärldens och vuxenvärldens reaktioner. Det handlar om förälskelser och uppbrott och illustrerar såväl positiva som negativa sidor ur alla vinklar och aspekter.

SvD säger i sin recension:

Här kan man påstå vad som helst, ljuga vad som helst och ta tillbaka det igen. Man kan iklä sig det ”normala” eller göra uppror mot det – allt medan man undersöker olika villkor.—Johan Bössman – som också regisserar – och Robert Jelinek har skrivit en timslång teatershow om allt det där att bli tonåring och brutalt övermannad av sina egna hormoner. Iscensättningen betonar den första stavelsen av lektion, lek. Stycket är en fartfylld genomgång av kärlek, kåthet, identitet, svek, längtan och utanförskap.—Publiken, idel 14-åringar, fnittrar, skrattar och släpper ifrån sig flämtningar av igenkänning medan föreställningen raskt dansar genom frågor om identitet. —Tomas Åhnstrand kastar sig mellan rastaflätor och emo-luva medan han verkligen hela tiden ger järnet: han spelar med hela kroppen, också dess mer pinsamma delar.

Tanken är också att det ska föras diskussioner i skolan efter teaterbesöket, men hur styrt är dessa diskussioner och vad händer om en tonåring har en avvikande åsikt? Skulle han/hon öppet våga redovisa den inför sina klasskamrater, eller är det en stor risk att man känner grupptryck och går med strömmen vad gäller åsikter och vad som är normalt?  Jag kan inte låta bli att fundera på om sådana här pjäser med efterföljande diskussioner kanske går i samma stil som UR:s satsning “Sex på kartan” som verkligen inte låter barn vara barn, utan lär högstadieungdomar ungefär “gör vad ni vill bara alla är med på det och tro inte att någonting är onormalt”. UR uppmuntrar skolbarn direkt eller indirekt till tidig sexdebut, och vägrar inse riskerna med detta vad gäller tomhet, grupptryck, utnyttjanden, sjukdomar och oönskade graviditeter. Skulle någon fjortonåring våga framföra åsikten om avhållsamhet fram till giftermålet? Det tror jag knappast, och en sådant idé finns förstås inte ens på UR.s sexkarta, och förmodligen det enda som skulle kunna betraktas som “onormalt”.

Jag ville bara jämföra dessa två evenemang eftersom jag tycker att en historiebeskrivning om varför svenskarna firar jul är harmlös och fullständigt ofarlig i jämförelse med vad vissa kulturnissar kan tvinga på våra barn utan att föräldrarna vet om det. Kanske lika bra om det är obligatorisk närvaro för barnen – oavsett lågvattenmärke på teaterföreställningen. Att en pjäs anses vara “populär och mycket uppskattad” kan betyda vad som helst. Gratis alkohol till alkoholister är också uppskattat. Jag tror många barn artigt säger att en pjäs är bra för att det förväntas av dem, och att de skrattar ibland betyder inte att sensmoralen är ok, eller att alla delar av pjäsen är bra för barnen att lyssna eller se på.

http://www.dagen.se/dagen/article.aspx?id=289025 (2011-12-09)